While helping to unpack a new shipment of French rifles at IO Inc / Royal Tiger Imports, I came across several examples of Berthiers that were modified to not use clips. There were a couple different ways the Ethiopian gunsmiths did this, so let’s have a look…
Semiauto Rifles
France’s Ultimate WW1 Selfloading Rifle: The RSC-1918
The French RSC-1917 semiauto rifle was a major step forward in arms technology during World War One, offering a reliable and effective self-loading rifle for issue to squad leaders, expert marksmen, and other particularly […]
Light MGs
M1918 Chauchat: First Shots (Will It Work?)
This M1918 Chauchat is still awaiting NFA transfer, but my dealer was able to bring it out to a public range where I could do some initial testing on it. I was expecting to get […]
Light MGs
A Soviet Look at Cold War Small Arms Development
I have covered various elements of small arms development during the Cold War more than a few times – usually involving the contentious process that led to the 7.62mm NATO cartridge being adopted, and the […]
So you go from three to ten rounds on the Berthier-Lee ? (Enfield referred to the rifling. not the action). What’s not to like?
Hmmm. Some Berthiers were converted to 7.5, I suppose the action could handle .308? I could do w/ an antique bolt action .308 running from Indian 2A1 mags…
The French Mle. 1907/15/34 was an arsenal revision of the Berthier 07/15 to 7.5 x 54 MAS, with a five-shot Mauser-type internal magazine fed by stripper clip;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ky04YGzuT2o
It was probably a better rifle overall than the MAS36, certainly better than the cutdown Lebel 1886/93 R35.
As for 8 x 50R Lebel in the 0.303in SMLE magazine, considering that the OAL of 8 x 50R is less than that of the 0.303in (2.75in vs 3.05in), I would expect that an unmodified SMLE 10-round magazine would hold eight rounds of 8 x 50R with no feeding problems.
As such, the rifle(s) using SMLE magazines were probably not rechambered or etc. At most, the feed lips of the SMLE “box” might have needed a bit of work with a file and a pair of pliers.
cheers
eon
Eon:
I agree that the Berthier 07/15/34 was an elegant weapon, moreso than the utilitarian MAS36 certainly.
Also, I agree that the Berthiers fitted with an Enfield magazine would most likely have been kept in 8mm, no point changing calibre if the 8mm rounds fitted a .303 magazine.
I have to say that one has to admire these Ethiopian gunsmiths. They seem to have done their best to keep these old guns going no matter what. But I would just ask, how hard could it have been to fabricate Berthier clips?
Given the wide variety of rifles in use with the Ethiopian they may have thought it uneconomical to produce disposable(!) Berthier clips for one specific rifle, especially when many mauser style stripper clips will work with multiple calibers anyways.
Troy:
Given the insane diversity of rifles in the Ethiopian army, I doubt they did a cost/benefit analysis of the cost of fabricating Berthier clips, which would not have been more than a fraction of the cost of a bullet.
“(…)7.5 x 54 MAS(…)”
There are existed earlier rimless cartridge linked with Berthier, it is today know as 7,65 x 53,7 Berthier xpl https://naboje.org/node/20219
It is described by SFM drawing dated 1891 and described as Turkish cartridge [of] mister Berthier, I do not know ballistic.
2:10 – Ian, It is no longer an “internal clip.”
It is an “internal magazine!”