There has been talk for a while of people making functional reproductions of the German FG-42 paratroop rifle for a long time…and it wasn’t just idle talk. We have gotten our hands on a sample of the second model FG-42 being made by SMG out of Texas, with instructions to go nuts, and not baby it in any way. Well! Sounds right up our alley.
I will be posting a complete review for TheFirearmBlog.com shortly, but here are the main points:
- We had 5 failures to extract in about 300 rounds, and Rick Smith at SMG suggested this was due to using Romanian surplus ammo. I checked, and the rims on my milsurp ammo were all in the 47-50 thousandth range (for thickness), while random boxes of Remington, Winchester, and Federal brass-cased 8mm was all at 40 thou. The rifle’s extractor was designed for commercial ammo, and going 20% larger caused the extractor to occasionally not fully snap over the case rim. We had no other rifle malfunctions throughout our testing, so I would rate the reliability as excellent as long as you don’t use stingy cheap-o ammo like I did.
- Handling was very good. It’s a relatively heavy rifle (~12 pounds), but that helps tame the recoil (along with the buffer design and muzzle brake). Rick Smith claims the recoil feels like a stock AK, and I would agree. The safety is totally un-ergonomic, but that’s how the gun was originally designed. Despite the weight of the piece, it is well balanced and great fun to shoot…and I had one person at the IPSC rifle match suggest that I should get a 20 second bonus for style.
- Historical accuracy is about 90%. The changes are the result of using modern small-scale production methodologies, and are understandable. Very few people can recognize the differences, and the working parts (except the ATF-mandated semi-only trigger) are functionally identical to the original. My only real complaint is that the metal reinforcing was left out of the handguard, and the one on our review rifle started to crack along the top of the barrel.
I think I’ve pretty well aired all the rifle’s dirty laundry, so if you watch the video and think one ought to be in your gun safe (either like this one in 8mm or in .308 using M14 mags), you should drop Rick a line at smgguns@yahoo.com and get on their waiting list. The future is foggy because of the potential for new legislation, so if you want one you should jump on it and get a receiver secured in your name ASAP. And if you do, please tell them you saw it here at Forgotten Weapons so they’ll send us a sample of the next gun they make too!
Last minute addition: SMG has one of the guns from the current batch for sale on GunBroker. It’s clearly going to be more than the list price, but it would be an opportunity to get one right now: http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=325959107
Was this article worth 15 cents to you? For less than the cost of a newsstand gun magazine, you can become a Forgotten Weapons Premium Member and help support the site, as well as get some cool industry discounts and access to our Members-Only forum!
I was interested until I saw that it was *not* the sharply-angled grip FG-42…
Good call, Rich — I’m guessing that SMG tried their level best to retain most of the original features of the FG-42 as much as current U.S. firearms law will allow, while still incorporating what they consider certain ergonomic improvements to cater to present-day enthusiasts, inclusive of the more vertically-configured grip that appeared later in World War Two. It would be interesting if SMG did offer, at some point, an option for the early-model, steeply-raked pistol grip.
The sharply-angled grip was the 1st model FG 42, so far SMG is only making semi-auto clones of the 2nd model. No idea if that’ll ever change. IIRC, most of the actual military FG 42s were 2nd model, because it’s just a better version of the design.
Romanian surplus ammo. I don’t believe it, what have I got myself into??? Lol
You all have a nice day guys, Its snowing in dear old blighty….D
It’s just our luck that this fantastic project is finally gearing up just as a potential ban looms on horizon…
For the scope is more simple cause Meotpa (Optikotechna) an original producer of the ZF4 during the WWII still produce the ZF4.
* http://www.frankonia.de/Zielfernrohr+ZF+4/Ansicht.html?Artikelnummer=149842
As usual, good stuff. This company from Texas(SMGuns) has been unknown to me, however as I am aware there is similar maker over in Europe – HMZ Kulmbach (http://hza-kulmbach.de/). I wonder, how these two relate and if they compete in that sense. Reviving old time guns is a glorious work!
They are not related to HZA, and the two don’t compete – the German-made repro is an almost exact replica, and the FCG has not been changed enough for ATF to allow importation as a semiauto. As far as I can tell, the German manufacturer has no particular interest in the US civilian market, and has no plans to make an ATF-compliant version. So you won’t be seeing them here in the US in the foreseeable future.
I was under the impression HZA closed down, sadly, at the end of the year.
NOOOOOOOO!!!!
Semiauto replicas:
http://ssd-weapon.com/web_de/produkte.htm
I first heard about this years ago, the manufacturers have been very pleasant to deal with but it will probably be sometime when I am 70 years old to scrape together the money for one of these.
No ban because it is not an “ASSAULT RIFLE” according to the progressive liberals and nutty Dems. around our declining nation.
So Ian, you didn’t mention the price!?
And do they have them in stock?
I WANT ONE SOON!
Regards
Pat
He mentioned it was about 5 grand. And that there’s already a waiting list. Which is two bummers right there.
Pat,
You’re mistaken about this not being subject to the proposed ban (although there are many proposed bans.In New York, it looks like they’ll be confiscating weapons that take over 7 round magazines. But hey, they’ll give you a $50 gift card for turning it in!
This gun would have been banned under the 1994 AWB as it has several naughty features, the existence of which in he same quantum universe are apparently what cause the urban diversity to whack each other in great numbers with stolen handguns. If only there were a law against that!
So far, NY is “only” banning future purchase of such weapons, and allow already-owned ones to be grandfathered in. But only if the owners register them. We’ll see how long it takes before they pass a new law to confiscate them, though.
The FG 42 repro has a bayonet, a pistol grip and a 20-round magazine. That makes it an “assault weapon” under the anti-gun crowd’s silly definition.
saw some old footage [ww2] of the weapon being used and noticed the bi-pod was mounted immeadiately in front of the wooden fore-end.
That was the first model (Type E). One of the changes of the second model was moving the bipod mount out to the muzzle.
Manufactured by Sport System Dittrich (BD-42 /1&/2 versions): http://www.ssd-weapon.com/Waffen_historisch.html
These are being sold in Canada where they retail for 9-10K
Looks like my SSD link was a double tap of the HZA one. Too bad HZA seems to have folded its tent. The VG1.5 copy looked interesting for Canada anyway(no SBR type restrictions here).
Had the chance to fire the BD-38 copy. Compared favourably with the original.
[...] isn’t it? Go here for Ian’s short writeup and nearly 16 minute video, including disassembled examination, a comparison of what’s like the original and [...]
Nice video. I especially enjoyed the clear and understandable function explanation.
AWESOME REVIEW !!!
i have recieved my fg after over one year on waiting list and everyday worth the wait
i see Ian you are a lefty as well as I , did you have any issues with this rifle being a right handers designed rifle ??
i would like to see some footage shooting with and without muzzle brake that would be fun.
the first group of semi auto fg42s where being sold at around 10,000 and people where lining up 5,000 is deal for amount of work and r&d SMG has put into this weapon
kymm
Nope, I didn’t have any issues shooting it left handed. I was a bit concerned beforehand, but it ejects far enough forward to be just fine.
Nice. The relative lack of suitable 8x57mm Mauser ammunition suggests they might want to consider a 7.62x51mm version, using a more commonplace magazine.
They do offer it in .308, using M14 mags.
Very cool. I wish more replica guns like this were being made.
From the video it looks like the op-rod acts as the striker like on the original. I would have thought the ATF would have made them change that because the original was a quasi open-bolt design (using an open bolt for auto and changing the release point till after the bolt is locked for semi). Did they make other changes to the system?
I find the FG-42′s operating system interesting as it bridges the gap between the Lewis and the M-60. I always wondered why they Lewis gun was never developed into a belt feed system in the inter war years as the pan mag was driven by the action of the bolt and a pawl.
[...] of all full-power battle rifles? I didn’t think so. Besides, now somebody’s making new-production FG42s, which does damage my thesis somewhat because damn, that’s a great rifle. I want one in [...]
I hope they make this in .308…
They do, actually – the .308 version uses M1A magazines.